<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the Tampa Tribune Understand Social Media?</title>
	<link>http://www.affariedge.com/blog/2007/04/02/does-the-tampa-tribune-understand-social-media/</link>
	<description>Discussion about advertising, marketing, and public relations...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: rcoats</title>
		<link>http://www.affariedge.com/blog/2007/04/02/does-the-tampa-tribune-understand-social-media/#comment-11</link>
		<author>rcoats</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affariedge.com/blog/2007/04/02/does-the-tampa-tribune-understand-social-media/#comment-11</guid>
					<description>Thanks for sharing this via email. 

We're not migrating away from comments - they are active on most breaking-news stories and blogs. However, a limitation to the "comment on this story" feature is that these comments don't have the cohesion of an ongoing discussion. We're looking to strike a balance between forums (topics that are evergreen) and one-off stories.

In other words, we're not substituting one for the other; we're doing both. What that balance looks like depends a lot on the feedback of users - like this. That, to me, is what social media is all about.

Rusty Coats
VP &#38; GM, TBO.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this via email. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re not migrating away from comments - they are active on most breaking-news stories and blogs. However, a limitation to the &#8220;comment on this story&#8221; feature is that these comments don&#8217;t have the cohesion of an ongoing discussion. We&#8217;re looking to strike a balance between forums (topics that are evergreen) and one-off stories.</p>
<p>In other words, we&#8217;re not substituting one for the other; we&#8217;re doing both. What that balance looks like depends a lot on the feedback of users - like this. That, to me, is what social media is all about.</p>
<p>Rusty Coats<br />
VP &amp; GM, TBO.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sticks of Fire: a Tampa blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; does the tampa tribune understand social media?</title>
		<link>http://www.affariedge.com/blog/2007/04/02/does-the-tampa-tribune-understand-social-media/#comment-12</link>
		<author>Sticks of Fire: a Tampa blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; does the tampa tribune understand social media?</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affariedge.com/blog/2007/04/02/does-the-tampa-tribune-understand-social-media/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>[...] [Cross posted on my work blog: www.AffariBlog.com.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Cross posted on my work blog: <a href="http://www.AffariBlog.com.]" rel="nofollow">www.AffariBlog.com.]</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
